Part 3: Space-Time Coding

Chapter 14: Space-Time Coding for ARQ

Advanced~240 min

Learning Objectives

  • Describe the ARQ protocol as a sequence of up to LL transmission rounds over independent block-fading MIMO realisations, distinguish Chase combining (CC) from incremental redundancy (IR), and explain why IR strictly dominates CC in the diversity-multiplexing-delay sense
  • State the El Gamal-Caire-Damen ARQ-DMT theorem: on an ntΓ—nrn_t \times n_r i.i.d. Rayleigh channel with at most LL ARQ rounds, the optimal tradeoff curve is dARQ(r,L)=Lβ‹…dβˆ—(r/L)d_{\mathrm{ARQ}}(r, L) = L \cdot d^{*}(r/L), where dβˆ—(β‹…)d^{*}(\cdot) is the Zheng-Tse static DMT of Chapter 12
  • Prove achievability of the ARQ-DMT via incremental-redundancy random Gaussian codes, and prove the converse via an outage bound on the LL-round mutual information
  • Define incremental-redundancy lattice space-time (IR-LAST) codes as nested CDA-based constructions, and explain why they achieve the ARQ-DMT at every (r,L)(r, L)
  • Map the ARQ-DMT story onto practical HARQ in LTE and 5G NR: redundancy versions, circular-buffer rate matching, stop-and-wait parallel HARQ processes, and URLLC retransmission budgets
  • Reason quantitatively about the operational cost of ARQ β€” latency, feedback overhead, independence assumption on successive rounds β€” and when the ARQ-DMT prediction of LL-fold diversity gain fails to materialise in practice

Sections

Prerequisites

πŸ’¬ Discussion

Loading discussions...