Chapter Summary

Chapter 4 Summary: Achievable Rate Analysis

Key Points

  • 1.

    The use-and-then-forget (UatF) bound provides a tractable lower bound on the achievable rate by treating the channel estimate as deterministic and absorbing estimation error into worst-case Gaussian noise, yielding closed-form SINR expressions that become tight under channel hardening.

  • 2.

    MRC combining achieves SINR that grows linearly with NtN_t but is interference-limited: the denominator jPtjβj+σ2\sum_j {P_t}_{j} \beta_{j} + \sigma^2 is independent of NtN_t, and multi-user interference does not vanish even with infinitely many antennas.

  • 3.

    ZF combining eliminates inter-user interference (from estimated channels) at the cost of KK spatial degrees of freedom, yielding an effective array gain of NtKN_t - K and a noise-limited (rather than interference-limited) rate expression.

  • 4.

    MMSE combining optimally balances noise enhancement and interference suppression, achieving the highest rate among linear receivers; its large-system behavior is characterized via random matrix theory (Stieltjes transform of the Marchenko-Pastur distribution).

  • 5.

    Sum rate scaling: MRC achieves Θ(Nt/lnNt)\Theta(N_t/\ln N_t), while ZF and MMSE achieve Θ(Nt)\Theta(N_t) with optimal user loading, confirming that massive MIMO delivers spatial multiplexing gain proportional to the number of antennas.

  • 6.

    Power scaling: all three schemes support transmit power reduction as 1/Nt1/N_t (exponent α=1\alpha = 1) with no rate loss in the single-cell case — the array gain perfectly compensates the reduced power, enabling green communication.

  • 7.

    Pilot contamination from other cells creates a finite rate ceiling that does not vanish with NtN_t and reduces the power scaling exponent to α=1/2\alpha = 1/2, motivating the pilot decontamination techniques of Chapter 3.

Looking Ahead

Chapter 5 turns the rate expressions developed here into a design tool by addressing power control and resource allocation. Given the closed-form SINR formulas, how should the base station allocate power across users to maximize fairness, sum rate, or energy efficiency? We will see that the UatF rate expressions — being concave in the power variables — lead to convex optimization problems with efficient solutions.