ISAC Fundamentals

The Golden Thread: From Sensing Operator to Communication Channel

Throughout this book we have developed the imaging model y=Ac+w\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{c} + \mathbf{w}, where A\mathbf{A} encodes the physics of wave propagation between transmitters and receivers. In communication, the received signal is y=Hx+w\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{H}\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{w}, where H\mathbf{H} encodes the same propagation physics. ISAC recognises that A\mathbf{A} and H\mathbf{H} describe the same physical environment --- and a single signal can serve both the communication function (recovering x\mathbf{x}) and the sensing function (recovering c\mathbf{c}).

This chapter formalises this unification and develops the waveform design and beamforming tools to exploit it.

Definition:

Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC)

A Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC) system uses a single transmitted signal x(t)\mathbf{x}(t) to simultaneously:

  1. Communicate data to KuK_u users via downlink beamforming.
  2. Sense the environment by processing the echoes of the same signal reflected from KtK_t targets.

The transmitter with NtN_t antennas sends:

x(t)=Wc sc(t)+Ws ss(t)\mathbf{x}(t) = \mathbf{W}_c \, \mathbf{s}_c(t) + \mathbf{W}_s \, \mathbf{s}_s(t)

where Wc∈CNtΓ—Ku\mathbf{W}_c \in \mathbb{C}^{N_t \times K_u} is the communication precoder, sc(t)\mathbf{s}_c(t) carries data, Ws∈CNtΓ—Kt\mathbf{W}_s \in \mathbb{C}^{N_t \times K_t} is the sensing precoder, and ss(t)\mathbf{s}_s(t) is a dedicated sensing waveform (which may be zero in fully communication-centric designs).

The total power constraint is:

tr⁑(WcWcH+WsWsH)≀Pt.\operatorname{tr}(\mathbf{W}_c\mathbf{W}_c^H + \mathbf{W}_s\mathbf{W}_s^H) \leq P_t.

In the most aggressive ISAC design, Ws=0\mathbf{W}_s = \mathbf{0}: the communication signal alone provides all sensing illumination. This is the communication-centric paradigm, and it is the most spectrum-efficient because no resources are reserved for sensing.

Definition:

Three ISAC Design Paradigms

ISAC waveform design falls into three paradigms:

1. Communication-centric: Start with a standard communication waveform (e.g., OFDM) and extract sensing information from the echoes. The waveform is optimised for data throughput; sensing is opportunistic. This is the most practical paradigm for 5G/6G.

2. Sensing-centric: Start with a radar waveform (e.g., FMCW chirp) and embed communication data in its parameters (phase modulation, index modulation). Sensing performance is prioritised.

3. Joint design: Optimise a single waveform to balance both functions:

min⁑Rxβ€…β€ŠDs(Rx)s.t.Rc(Rx)β‰₯Rmin⁑,β€…β€Štr⁑(Rx)≀Pt\min_{\mathbf{R}_x} \; D_s(\mathbf{R}_x) \quad \text{s.t.} \quad R_c(\mathbf{R}_x) \geq R_{\min}, \; \operatorname{tr}(\mathbf{R}_x) \leq P_t

where DsD_s is a sensing distortion metric and RcR_c is the communication rate.

The choice of paradigm depends on the application. Vehicular ISAC typically uses communication-centric (OFDM is the 5G NR waveform). Military radar with embedded data links uses sensing-centric. Research frontier: joint design that provably achieves the Pareto boundary.

Definition:

ISAC Performance Metrics

Communication metric: Sum-rate for KuK_u users:

Rc=βˆ‘k=1Kulog⁑2 ⁣(1+∣hkHvc,k∣2βˆ‘jβ‰ k∣hkHvc,j∣2+Οƒ2)R_c = \sum_{k=1}^{K_u} \log_2\!\left(1 + \frac{|\mathbf{h}_k^H \mathbf{v}_{c,k}|^2}{\sum_{j \neq k}|\mathbf{h}_k^H \mathbf{v}_{c,j}|^2 + \sigma^2}\right)

where hk\mathbf{h}_k is the channel to user kk and vc,k\mathbf{v}_{c,k} is the kk-th communication beamforming vector.

Sensing metric (imaging): Mutual information between the scene reflectivity c\mathbf{c} and the received echo:

MIsens=log⁑det⁑ ⁣(I+1Οƒ2ARxAH)\mathrm{MI}_{\mathrm{sens}} = \log\det\!\left(\mathbf{I} + \frac{1}{\sigma^2}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{R}_x\mathbf{A}^{H}\right)

Sensing metric (tracking): Cramer-Rao bound for target parameter estimation:

CRB(ΞΈk)=[Jβˆ’1(ΞΈ)]kk\mathrm{CRB}(\theta_k) = \left[\mathbf{J}^{-1}(\boldsymbol{\theta})\right]_{kk}

where J\mathbf{J} is the Fisher information matrix.

The choice of sensing metric matters profoundly. MI measures overall imaging quality (relevant for scene reconstruction as in Parts III--VII). CRB measures parameter estimation accuracy (relevant for target tracking). The optimal waveform differs for each --- and connecting MI to the imaging PSF is what makes the RFI perspective unique.

Definition:

ISAC Spectral Efficiency Gain

The ISAC spectral efficiency gain over separate systems is:

Separate: Communication uses bandwidth WcW_{c}, sensing uses WsW_{s}. Total: Wc+WsW_{c} + W_{s}.

ISAC: Both share bandwidth WISACW_{\mathrm{ISAC}}. The gain is:

GSE=Wc+WsWISAC≀2G_{\mathrm{SE}} = \frac{W_{c} + W_{s}}{W_{\mathrm{ISAC}}} \leq 2

with equality when Wc=Ws=WISACW_{c} = W_{s} = W_{\mathrm{ISAC}}.

Beyond spectrum, ISAC saves hardware (shared array, RF chains, baseband) and energy (single transmitter, no dedicated radar).

Historical Note: From Radar and Radio to ISAC

2017--present

Radar and radio communication were born from the same physics (Maxwell's equations) and the same wartime engineering (World War II). For 80 years they developed as separate disciplines with separate hardware, spectrum, and signal processing. The convergence began in the 2010s when both systems moved to mmWave bands and large arrays, making spectrum sharing unavoidable. The term "ISAC" was coined around 2020, and by 2023 it had become a key pillar of the 6G research agenda.

The information-theoretic foundations were laid by Chiriyath, Paul, and Bliss (2017), who first formalised the capacity- distortion tradeoff. The connection to the imaging framework of this book --- where the sensing matrix A\mathbf{A} is explicitly constructed from the ISAC waveform --- was developed by Caire and collaborators.

Historical Note: The Spectrum Crisis That Forced Convergence

2020--2025

By 2020, the total spectrum allocated to mobile communication below 6 GHz was approximately 2 GHz, while automotive radar alone occupied 4 GHz at 77 GHz. The move to mmWave 5G (24--40 GHz) placed communication squarely in traditional radar bands. Rather than fight over spectrum, ISAC proposes to share it --- turning a crisis into an opportunity. The IEEE 802.11bf standard (WiFi sensing) and 3GPP Release 19 (NR sensing) are the first standards to formalise this coexistence.

Example: Power Splitting vs. Joint Design

An ISAC base station with Nt=8N_t = 8 antennas, Ku=2K_u = 2 users, and Kt=1K_t = 1 target operates at SNR=20\text{SNR} = 20 dB. Compare: (a) naive power splitting with ρ=0.5\rho = 0.5; (b) joint beamforming that minimises CRB subject to rate constraints.

Quick Check

A 5G NR base station uses its standard OFDM downlink signal to detect nearby vehicles from the echoes. Which ISAC paradigm is this?

Communication-centric

Sensing-centric

Joint design

Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC)

A system that uses a single transmitted signal for both data communication and radar sensing simultaneously, sharing hardware, spectrum, and waveform.

Related: Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC)

Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC)

The broader paradigm encompassing DFRC, spectrum sharing, and joint waveform/beamforming design for simultaneous communication and environmental sensing. A key pillar of the 6G vision.

Related: Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC)

Power Split Ratio

The fraction ρ=Ps/Pt\rho = P_s / P_t of total transmit power allocated to sensing. The remaining (1βˆ’Ο)Pt(1 - \rho)P_t goes to communication. The optimal ρ\rho depends on the sensing and communication channel geometries.

ISAC Sensing-Communication Pareto Frontier

Explore the Pareto frontier between communication rate and sensing CRB as the power allocation varies. Observe how more antennas reduce the tradeoff severity, and how the target angle relative to the user direction affects the frontier shape.

Parameters
8
15
40

Why This Matters: ISAC in the Telecom Curriculum

ISAC connects to the Telecom book (Chapter 32) which covers MIMO communication capacity, and to the ITA book (Chapter 18) which develops the information-theoretic capacity-distortion tradeoff. Here we specialise these results to the RF imaging context, where the sensing side of ISAC is the forward model y=Ac+w\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{c} + \mathbf{w}.

Key Takeaway

ISAC uses a single signal for simultaneous communication and sensing, with three design paradigms: communication-centric (OFDM + echoes), sensing-centric (radar + data), and joint design. The fundamental tradeoff between rate and sensing quality is governed by the power split and beamforming design. Joint beamforming significantly outperforms naive power splitting by exploiting the "free sensing" energy in communication beams.