ISAC Fundamentals
The Golden Thread: From Sensing Operator to Communication Channel
Throughout this book we have developed the imaging model , where encodes the physics of wave propagation between transmitters and receivers. In communication, the received signal is , where encodes the same propagation physics. ISAC recognises that and describe the same physical environment --- and a single signal can serve both the communication function (recovering ) and the sensing function (recovering ).
This chapter formalises this unification and develops the waveform design and beamforming tools to exploit it.
Definition: Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC)
Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC)
A Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC) system uses a single transmitted signal to simultaneously:
- Communicate data to users via downlink beamforming.
- Sense the environment by processing the echoes of the same signal reflected from targets.
The transmitter with antennas sends:
where is the communication precoder, carries data, is the sensing precoder, and is a dedicated sensing waveform (which may be zero in fully communication-centric designs).
The total power constraint is:
In the most aggressive ISAC design, : the communication signal alone provides all sensing illumination. This is the communication-centric paradigm, and it is the most spectrum-efficient because no resources are reserved for sensing.
Definition: Three ISAC Design Paradigms
Three ISAC Design Paradigms
ISAC waveform design falls into three paradigms:
1. Communication-centric: Start with a standard communication waveform (e.g., OFDM) and extract sensing information from the echoes. The waveform is optimised for data throughput; sensing is opportunistic. This is the most practical paradigm for 5G/6G.
2. Sensing-centric: Start with a radar waveform (e.g., FMCW chirp) and embed communication data in its parameters (phase modulation, index modulation). Sensing performance is prioritised.
3. Joint design: Optimise a single waveform to balance both functions:
where is a sensing distortion metric and is the communication rate.
The choice of paradigm depends on the application. Vehicular ISAC typically uses communication-centric (OFDM is the 5G NR waveform). Military radar with embedded data links uses sensing-centric. Research frontier: joint design that provably achieves the Pareto boundary.
Definition: ISAC Performance Metrics
ISAC Performance Metrics
Communication metric: Sum-rate for users:
where is the channel to user and is the -th communication beamforming vector.
Sensing metric (imaging): Mutual information between the scene reflectivity and the received echo:
Sensing metric (tracking): Cramer-Rao bound for target parameter estimation:
where is the Fisher information matrix.
The choice of sensing metric matters profoundly. MI measures overall imaging quality (relevant for scene reconstruction as in Parts III--VII). CRB measures parameter estimation accuracy (relevant for target tracking). The optimal waveform differs for each --- and connecting MI to the imaging PSF is what makes the RFI perspective unique.
Definition: ISAC Spectral Efficiency Gain
ISAC Spectral Efficiency Gain
The ISAC spectral efficiency gain over separate systems is:
Separate: Communication uses bandwidth , sensing uses . Total: .
ISAC: Both share bandwidth . The gain is:
with equality when .
Beyond spectrum, ISAC saves hardware (shared array, RF chains, baseband) and energy (single transmitter, no dedicated radar).
Historical Note: From Radar and Radio to ISAC
2017--presentRadar and radio communication were born from the same physics (Maxwell's equations) and the same wartime engineering (World War II). For 80 years they developed as separate disciplines with separate hardware, spectrum, and signal processing. The convergence began in the 2010s when both systems moved to mmWave bands and large arrays, making spectrum sharing unavoidable. The term "ISAC" was coined around 2020, and by 2023 it had become a key pillar of the 6G research agenda.
The information-theoretic foundations were laid by Chiriyath, Paul, and Bliss (2017), who first formalised the capacity- distortion tradeoff. The connection to the imaging framework of this book --- where the sensing matrix is explicitly constructed from the ISAC waveform --- was developed by Caire and collaborators.
Historical Note: The Spectrum Crisis That Forced Convergence
2020--2025By 2020, the total spectrum allocated to mobile communication below 6 GHz was approximately 2 GHz, while automotive radar alone occupied 4 GHz at 77 GHz. The move to mmWave 5G (24--40 GHz) placed communication squarely in traditional radar bands. Rather than fight over spectrum, ISAC proposes to share it --- turning a crisis into an opportunity. The IEEE 802.11bf standard (WiFi sensing) and 3GPP Release 19 (NR sensing) are the first standards to formalise this coexistence.
Example: Power Splitting vs. Joint Design
An ISAC base station with antennas, users, and target operates at dB. Compare: (a) naive power splitting with ; (b) joint beamforming that minimises CRB subject to rate constraints.
Naive power splitting
Allocate to communication (ZF beamforming) and to a sensing beam toward the target. Rate: bits/s/Hz. CRB: rad.
Joint beamforming
Jointly optimise to minimise CRB subject to . The key insight: communication beams also illuminate the target, providing "free" sensing energy. Result: bits/s/Hz (5% reduced), rad ( better).
Key insight
Joint design achieves better sensing with only 5% rate loss by reusing communication signal energy for sensing. This is the fundamental advantage of ISAC over separate systems.
Quick Check
A 5G NR base station uses its standard OFDM downlink signal to detect nearby vehicles from the echoes. Which ISAC paradigm is this?
Communication-centric
Sensing-centric
Joint design
The waveform is a standard OFDM communication signal; sensing is performed opportunistically on the echoes.
Dual-Function Radar-Communication (DFRC)
A system that uses a single transmitted signal for both data communication and radar sensing simultaneously, sharing hardware, spectrum, and waveform.
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC)
The broader paradigm encompassing DFRC, spectrum sharing, and joint waveform/beamforming design for simultaneous communication and environmental sensing. A key pillar of the 6G vision.
Power Split Ratio
The fraction of total transmit power allocated to sensing. The remaining goes to communication. The optimal depends on the sensing and communication channel geometries.
ISAC Sensing-Communication Pareto Frontier
Explore the Pareto frontier between communication rate and sensing CRB as the power allocation varies. Observe how more antennas reduce the tradeoff severity, and how the target angle relative to the user direction affects the frontier shape.
Parameters
Why This Matters: ISAC in the Telecom Curriculum
ISAC connects to the Telecom book (Chapter 32) which covers MIMO communication capacity, and to the ITA book (Chapter 18) which develops the information-theoretic capacity-distortion tradeoff. Here we specialise these results to the RF imaging context, where the sensing side of ISAC is the forward model .
Key Takeaway
ISAC uses a single signal for simultaneous communication and sensing, with three design paradigms: communication-centric (OFDM + echoes), sensing-centric (radar + data), and joint design. The fundamental tradeoff between rate and sensing quality is governed by the power split and beamforming design. Joint beamforming significantly outperforms naive power splitting by exploiting the "free sensing" energy in communication beams.