ISAC Waveform Design
Which Waveform for ISAC?
The waveform is the engineer's primary design lever in ISAC. OFDM dominates 5G communication but has high PAPR and poor Doppler resolution. FMCW is the workhorse of automotive radar but carries no communication data natively. OTFS operates in the delay-Doppler domain where both channel and targets are sparse --- making it a natural candidate for ISAC.
This section develops each approach and culminates with the CommIT group's contributions on OTFS-ISAC and DD-domain design.
Definition: OFDM-ISAC Waveform
OFDM-ISAC Waveform
In OFDM-ISAC, the OFDM communication signal serves dual purposes. The transmitted signal on subcarrier is:
where is the data symbol and is a dedicated sensing pilot (zero on most subcarriers).
The received echo from a target at range and velocity is:
where is the round-trip delay and is the Doppler shift.
Sensing processing: After data-symbol compensation (), apply 2D-FFT to extract the range-Doppler map (as in Chapter 10).
The data-symbol compensation step requires knowledge of the transmitted data --- available at the transmitter (monostatic ISAC) but not at a separate receiver (bistatic ISAC, see Section 29.5). For bistatic, only pilot subcarriers provide clean sensing measurements.
Definition: OFDM Pilot Placement for Sensing
OFDM Pilot Placement for Sensing
The sensing performance of OFDM-ISAC depends critically on the pilot pattern. For pilot subcarriers placed at indices :
Range ambiguity function:
Design criterion: Minimise the peak sidelobe level (PSL) of outside the mainlobe:
Uniform placement () minimises PSL at dB (Dirichlet kernel) but creates range ambiguity at . Random placement reduces PSL to dB (in expectation) but with higher variance.
Definition: FMCW-ISAC Waveform
FMCW-ISAC Waveform
In sensing-centric ISAC, communication data is embedded in an FMCW chirp. The baseband chirp signal is:
where is the chirp rate. Data embedding methods:
-
Phase modulation: Modulate the chirp's initial phase per sweep: where carries one PSK symbol per chirp.
-
Index modulation: Select one of chirp rates to convey bits.
-
OFDM-chirp hybrid: Partition the bandwidth into FMCW (for sensing) and OFDM (for data).
Data rate is typically low ( Mbit/s) because each chirp carries only 1--4 bits.
FMCW-ISAC is attractive for automotive radar (77 GHz) where the primary function is sensing and a low-rate data link suffices for vehicle-to-vehicle coordination. For high-rate cellular ISAC, communication-centric OFDM is preferred.
Definition: OTFS-ISAC Waveform
OTFS-ISAC Waveform
OTFS (Orthogonal Time Frequency Space) places symbols on a delay-Doppler grid via the inverse symplectic finite Fourier transform (ISFFT). The transmit signal in the DD domain is:
where is the delay index and is the Doppler index. The DD-domain input-output relation for a target with delay and Doppler is:
where and are the quantised delay and Doppler indices.
Key advantage for ISAC: In the DD domain, the channel is (approximately) a 2D convolution with a sparse kernel. Each target creates a single peak at , making target detection equivalent to reading off the channel taps.
The sparse DD-domain representation is precisely the scene representation used in imaging (Chapter 8). OTFS-ISAC naturally produces the "sensing matrix" as a structured DD-domain operator --- connecting the waveform design directly to the imaging forward model.
OTFS-ISAC and DD-Domain Waveform Design
Yuan, Schober, and Caire proposed OTFS as a natural ISAC waveform, exploiting the delay-Doppler domain where both the communication channel and radar targets admit sparse representations. Their key insights:
-
Unified DD-domain model: The OTFS input-output relation serves simultaneously as the communication channel model (for data detection) and the radar measurement model (for target estimation). No separate processing chain is needed.
-
Pilot design in DD domain: A single impulse pilot in the DD grid, surrounded by guard symbols, enables unambiguous channel/target estimation with complexity .
-
Performance comparison: OTFS-ISAC achieves 3--5 dB better Doppler estimation accuracy than OFDM-ISAC at the same spectral efficiency, because OTFS coherently processes the entire frame (all OFDM symbols jointly).
Gaudio, Kobayashi, and Caire further extended this to optimised DD-domain waveform design, where the pilot pattern and data placement are jointly optimised for imaging quality.
ISAC Waveform Comparison
| Property | OFDM-ISAC | FMCW-ISAC | OTFS-ISAC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication rate | High (standard 5G NR) | Very low (1--4 bits/chirp) | High (comparable to OFDM) |
| Range resolution | (same) | ||
| Doppler resolution | β limited by frame length | β limited by chirp duration | β full frame coherent |
| Maximum Doppler | β limited by ICI | Unlimited (constant modulus) | Higher than OFDM (DD-domain) |
| PAPR | High (10--12 dB) | Low (constant modulus) | Moderate (depends on precoding) |
| Bistatic sensing | Pilot-only (data unknown at Rx) | Full waveform known | Pilot-only (same issue as OFDM) |
| 5G/6G compatibility | Direct (NR waveform) | Requires separate band | Under study for 6G |
| Imaging quality (PSF) | Good range, limited Doppler | Excellent range-Doppler | Excellent range-Doppler |
ISAC Waveform Comparison: Sensing and Communication Metrics
Compare OFDM-ISAC, FMCW-ISAC, and OTFS-ISAC across key sensing and communication metrics as system parameters vary.
Parameters
Example: OFDM-ISAC Pilot Pattern for 5G NR
A 5G NR ISAC base station with subcarriers ( kHz, MHz) must support communication and sensing. Design the pilot placement for maximum unambiguous range and compare dedicated vs. dual-use subcarrier allocation.
Dedicated pilot allocation
Reserve subcarriers (20%) as sensing pilots, uniformly spaced every 5 subcarriers. Communication throughput reduced by 20%. Sensing: clean measurements with no data-compensation noise.
Full dual-use
All 3300 subcarriers carry data. Sensing uses echoes after data-symbol compensation. Full throughput, but sensing SNR reduced by dB from noise enhancement.
Recommended: hybrid comb pattern
Insert pilots every 5th subcarrier (comb pattern): , uniform. Unambiguous range: m. Range resolution: m. Communication throughput: 80% of maximum. This is the recommended trade-off for indoor/urban ISAC.
Theorem: Transmit Covariance Design as SDP
The ISAC transmit covariance optimisation:
is a convex semidefinite program (SDP) and can be solved in polynomial time via interior-point methods.
The objective is concave in (composition of concave with affine function). The sensing constraints are linear in . Convexity guarantees the KKT conditions are sufficient --- and convexity is what separates problems we can solve from those we cannot.
Concavity of objective
is concave on the PSD cone because is concave on and is affine.
Constraints are LMIs
is a linear inequality in . Combined with and , the feasible set is a spectrahedron.
SDP formulation
Maximising a concave function over a spectrahedron is a standard SDP (after epigraph reformulation of ). Complexity: via interior-point.
Common Mistake: Ignoring PAPR Constraints in ISAC Waveform Design
Mistake:
Optimising the transmit covariance without considering peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and power amplifier (PA) constraints.
Correction:
The SDP yields the optimal , but the actual signal must satisfy hardware constraints. Two-stage design: (1) find optimal via SDP; (2) synthesise a practical waveform approximating under PAPR constraints (e.g., using constant-modulus waveform design or OFDM with PAPR reduction). The gap is typically 1--2 dB.
Common Mistake: Neglecting Noise Enhancement in Data-Symbol Compensation
Mistake:
Using for sensing without accounting for noise enhancement when is small.
Correction:
Data-symbol compensation divides noise by the data symbol: the effective noise variance is . For QPSK () this is benign, but for higher-order QAM with symbols near the origin, noise is amplified. Mitigation: weight sensing measurements by (MMSE combining), or use only pilot subcarriers for sensing (bypassing compensation entirely).
Quick Check
What is the primary advantage of OTFS over OFDM as an ISAC waveform for high-mobility scenarios?
OTFS achieves better Doppler resolution by coherently processing the entire frame
OTFS has lower PAPR than OFDM
OTFS uses less bandwidth for the same range resolution
OTFS processes all OFDM symbols jointly in the DD domain, achieving Doppler resolution instead of being limited by inter-carrier interference.
OTFS-ISAC
ISAC system using Orthogonal Time Frequency Space modulation, which places communication symbols on a delay-Doppler grid. Targets appear as sparse peaks in the DD domain, enabling joint data detection and target estimation from the same received signal.
Delay-Doppler Domain
The 2D domain parameterised by propagation delay and Doppler shift . In this domain, both wireless channels and radar targets admit sparse representations, making it the natural domain for joint sensing-communication processing.
Key Takeaway
ISAC waveform design spans OFDM (communication-centric, 5G NR compatible), FMCW (sensing-centric, automotive), and OTFS (joint DD-domain design). The transmit covariance optimisation is a convex SDP. OTFS-ISAC, developed by Yuan/Schober/Caire, is a natural fit because the DD domain provides sparse representations for both communication channels and radar targets, directly connecting to the imaging forward model of this book.