ISAC Waveform Design

Which Waveform for ISAC?

The waveform is the engineer's primary design lever in ISAC. OFDM dominates 5G communication but has high PAPR and poor Doppler resolution. FMCW is the workhorse of automotive radar but carries no communication data natively. OTFS operates in the delay-Doppler domain where both channel and targets are sparse --- making it a natural candidate for ISAC.

This section develops each approach and culminates with the CommIT group's contributions on OTFS-ISAC and DD-domain design.

Definition:

OFDM-ISAC Waveform

In OFDM-ISAC, the OFDM communication signal serves dual purposes. The transmitted signal on subcarrier kk is:

X[n,k]=Sd[n,k]+Sp[n,k]X[n, k] = S_d[n, k] + S_p[n, k]

where Sd[n,k]S_d[n, k] is the data symbol and Sp[n,k]S_p[n, k] is a dedicated sensing pilot (zero on most subcarriers).

The received echo from a target at range RR and velocity vv is:

Ys[n,k]=α eβˆ’j2Ο€fkτ ej2Ο€nTsΞ½D X[n,k]+W[n,k]Y_s[n, k] = \alpha \, e^{-j2\pi f_k \tau} \, e^{j2\pi n T_s \nu_D} \, X[n, k] + W[n, k]

where Ο„=2R/c\tau = 2R/c is the round-trip delay and Ξ½D=2vf0/c\nu_D = 2vf_0/c is the Doppler shift.

Sensing processing: After data-symbol compensation (Z[n,k]=Ys[n,k]/X[n,k]Z[n,k] = Y_s[n,k]/X[n,k]), apply 2D-FFT to extract the range-Doppler map (as in Chapter 10).

The data-symbol compensation step requires knowledge of the transmitted data --- available at the transmitter (monostatic ISAC) but not at a separate receiver (bistatic ISAC, see Section 29.5). For bistatic, only pilot subcarriers provide clean sensing measurements.

Definition:

OFDM Pilot Placement for Sensing

The sensing performance of OFDM-ISAC depends critically on the pilot pattern. For NpN_p pilot subcarriers placed at indices KpβŠ‚{0,…,Ncβˆ’1}\mathcal{K}_p \subset \{0, \ldots, N_c - 1\}:

Range ambiguity function: Ο‡R(Ο„)=βˆ‘k∈Kpeβˆ’j2Ο€kΞ”fΟ„\chi_R(\tau) = \sum_{k \in \mathcal{K}_p} e^{-j2\pi k \Delta f \tau}

Design criterion: Minimise the peak sidelobe level (PSL) of βˆ£Ο‡R(Ο„)∣|\chi_R(\tau)| outside the mainlobe:

min⁑Kpβ€…β€Šmax⁑τ>Ο„resβˆ£Ο‡R(Ο„)βˆ£βˆ£Ο‡R(0)∣\min_{\mathcal{K}_p} \; \max_{\tau > \tau_{\mathrm{res}}} \frac{|\chi_R(\tau)|}{|\chi_R(0)|}

Uniform placement (k∈{0,L,2L,…}k \in \{0, L, 2L, \ldots\}) minimises PSL at βˆ’13.2-13.2 dB (Dirichlet kernel) but creates range ambiguity at Rmax⁑=c/(2LΞ”f)R_{\max} = c/(2L\Delta f). Random placement reduces PSL to βˆΌβˆ’Np/2\sim -N_p/2 dB (in expectation) but with higher variance.

,

Definition:

FMCW-ISAC Waveform

In sensing-centric ISAC, communication data is embedded in an FMCW chirp. The baseband chirp signal is:

s(t)=ejπμt2s(t) = e^{j\pi \mu t^2}

where ΞΌ=W/Tc\mu = W/T_c is the chirp rate. Data embedding methods:

  1. Phase modulation: Modulate the chirp's initial phase per sweep: sn(t)=ejΟ•nejπμt2s_n(t) = e^{j\phi_n} e^{j\pi\mu t^2} where Ο•n\phi_n carries one PSK symbol per chirp.

  2. Index modulation: Select one of MM chirp rates {ΞΌ1,…,ΞΌM}\{\mu_1, \ldots, \mu_M\} to convey log⁑2M\log_2 M bits.

  3. OFDM-chirp hybrid: Partition the bandwidth into FMCW (for sensing) and OFDM (for data).

Data rate is typically low (<1< 1 Mbit/s) because each chirp carries only 1--4 bits.

FMCW-ISAC is attractive for automotive radar (77 GHz) where the primary function is sensing and a low-rate data link suffices for vehicle-to-vehicle coordination. For high-rate cellular ISAC, communication-centric OFDM is preferred.

Definition:

OTFS-ISAC Waveform

OTFS (Orthogonal Time Frequency Space) places symbols on a delay-Doppler grid via the inverse symplectic finite Fourier transform (ISFFT). The transmit signal in the DD domain is:

X[β„“,k]=Xd[β„“,k]+Xp[β„“,k]X[\ell, k] = X_d[\ell, k] + X_p[\ell, k]

where β„“=0,…,Mβˆ’1\ell = 0, \ldots, M-1 is the delay index and k=0,…,Nβˆ’1k = 0, \ldots, N-1 is the Doppler index. The DD-domain input-output relation for a target with delay Ο„i\tau_i and Doppler Ξ½i\nu_i is:

Y[β„“,k]=βˆ‘ihi X[(β„“βˆ’β„“i)M,(kβˆ’ki)N]+W[β„“,k]Y[\ell, k] = \sum_i h_i \, X[(\ell - \ell_i)_M, (k - k_i)_N] + W[\ell, k]

where β„“i=βŒŠΟ„i/(1/MΞ”f)βŒ‹\ell_i = \lfloor \tau_i / (1/M\Delta f) \rfloor and ki=⌊νi/(1/NTs)βŒ‹k_i = \lfloor \nu_i / (1/NT_s) \rfloor are the quantised delay and Doppler indices.

Key advantage for ISAC: In the DD domain, the channel is (approximately) a 2D convolution with a sparse kernel. Each target creates a single peak at (β„“i,ki)(\ell_i, k_i), making target detection equivalent to reading off the channel taps.

The sparse DD-domain representation is precisely the scene representation used in imaging (Chapter 8). OTFS-ISAC naturally produces the "sensing matrix" A\mathbf{A} as a structured DD-domain operator --- connecting the waveform design directly to the imaging forward model.

πŸŽ“CommIT Contribution(2021)

OTFS-ISAC and DD-Domain Waveform Design

W. Yuan, R. Schober, G. Caire β€” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing

Yuan, Schober, and Caire proposed OTFS as a natural ISAC waveform, exploiting the delay-Doppler domain where both the communication channel and radar targets admit sparse representations. Their key insights:

  1. Unified DD-domain model: The OTFS input-output relation serves simultaneously as the communication channel model (for data detection) and the radar measurement model (for target estimation). No separate processing chain is needed.

  2. Pilot design in DD domain: A single impulse pilot in the DD grid, surrounded by guard symbols, enables unambiguous channel/target estimation with complexity O(MNlog⁑(MN))O(MN \log(MN)).

  3. Performance comparison: OTFS-ISAC achieves 3--5 dB better Doppler estimation accuracy than OFDM-ISAC at the same spectral efficiency, because OTFS coherently processes the entire frame (all NN OFDM symbols jointly).

Gaudio, Kobayashi, and Caire further extended this to optimised DD-domain waveform design, where the pilot pattern and data placement are jointly optimised for imaging quality.

ISACOTFSdelay-Dopplerwaveform-designCommIT
,

ISAC Waveform Comparison

PropertyOFDM-ISACFMCW-ISACOTFS-ISAC
Communication rateHigh (standard 5G NR)Very low (1--4 bits/chirp)High (comparable to OFDM)
Range resolutionc/(2W)c/(2W)c/(2W)c/(2W)c/(2W)c/(2W) (same)
Doppler resolution1/(NTs)1/(N T_s) β€” limited by frame length1/Tc1/T_c β€” limited by chirp duration1/(NTs)1/(N T_s) β€” full frame coherent
Maximum DopplerΞ”f/2\Delta f / 2 β€” limited by ICIUnlimited (constant modulus)Higher than OFDM (DD-domain)
PAPRHigh (10--12 dB)Low (constant modulus)Moderate (depends on precoding)
Bistatic sensingPilot-only (data unknown at Rx)Full waveform knownPilot-only (same issue as OFDM)
5G/6G compatibilityDirect (NR waveform)Requires separate bandUnder study for 6G
Imaging quality (PSF)Good range, limited DopplerExcellent range-DopplerExcellent range-Doppler
,

ISAC Waveform Comparison: Sensing and Communication Metrics

Compare OFDM-ISAC, FMCW-ISAC, and OTFS-ISAC across key sensing and communication metrics as system parameters vary.

Parameters
100
64
15

Example: OFDM-ISAC Pilot Pattern for 5G NR

A 5G NR ISAC base station with Nc=3300N_c = 3300 subcarriers (Ξ”f=120\Delta f = 120 kHz, W=396W = 396 MHz) must support communication and sensing. Design the pilot placement for maximum unambiguous range and compare dedicated vs. dual-use subcarrier allocation.

Theorem: Transmit Covariance Design as SDP

The ISAC transmit covariance optimisation:

max⁑Rxβͺ°0β€…β€Šlog⁑det⁑ ⁣(I+1Οƒc2HRxHH)s.t.{a(ΞΈk)HRxa(ΞΈk)β‰₯Ξ³k,β€…β€Šk=1,…,Kttr⁑(Rx)≀Pt\max_{\mathbf{R}_x \succeq 0} \; \log\det\!\left(\mathbf{I} + \frac{1}{\sigma^2_{c}}\mathbf{H}\mathbf{R}_x\mathbf{H}^H\right) \quad \text{s.t.} \quad \begin{cases} \mathbf{a}(\theta_k)^H\mathbf{R}_x\mathbf{a}(\theta_k) \geq \gamma_k, \; k = 1, \ldots, K_t \\ \operatorname{tr}(\mathbf{R}_x) \leq P_t \end{cases}

is a convex semidefinite program (SDP) and can be solved in polynomial time via interior-point methods.

The objective log⁑det⁑(β‹…)\log\det(\cdot) is concave in Rx\mathbf{R}_x (composition of concave log⁑det⁑\log\det with affine function). The sensing constraints are linear in Rx\mathbf{R}_x. Convexity guarantees the KKT conditions are sufficient --- and convexity is what separates problems we can solve from those we cannot.

Common Mistake: Ignoring PAPR Constraints in ISAC Waveform Design

Mistake:

Optimising the transmit covariance Rx\mathbf{R}_x without considering peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and power amplifier (PA) constraints.

Correction:

The SDP yields the optimal Rx\mathbf{R}_x, but the actual signal must satisfy hardware constraints. Two-stage design: (1) find optimal Rx\mathbf{R}_x via SDP; (2) synthesise a practical waveform approximating Rx\mathbf{R}_x under PAPR constraints (e.g., using constant-modulus waveform design or OFDM with PAPR reduction). The gap is typically 1--2 dB.

Common Mistake: Neglecting Noise Enhancement in Data-Symbol Compensation

Mistake:

Using Z[n,k]=Ys[n,k]/X[n,k]Z[n,k] = Y_s[n,k] / X[n,k] for sensing without accounting for noise enhancement when ∣X[n,k]∣|X[n,k]| is small.

Correction:

Data-symbol compensation divides noise by the data symbol: the effective noise variance is Οƒ2/∣X[n,k]∣2\sigma^2/|X[n,k]|^2. For QPSK (∣X∣=1|X| = 1) this is benign, but for higher-order QAM with symbols near the origin, noise is amplified. Mitigation: weight sensing measurements by ∣X[n,k]∣2|X[n,k]|^2 (MMSE combining), or use only pilot subcarriers for sensing (bypassing compensation entirely).

Quick Check

What is the primary advantage of OTFS over OFDM as an ISAC waveform for high-mobility scenarios?

OTFS achieves better Doppler resolution by coherently processing the entire frame

OTFS has lower PAPR than OFDM

OTFS uses less bandwidth for the same range resolution

OTFS-ISAC

ISAC system using Orthogonal Time Frequency Space modulation, which places communication symbols on a delay-Doppler grid. Targets appear as sparse peaks in the DD domain, enabling joint data detection and target estimation from the same received signal.

Related: Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC)

Delay-Doppler Domain

The 2D domain parameterised by propagation delay Ο„\tau and Doppler shift Ξ½\nu. In this domain, both wireless channels and radar targets admit sparse representations, making it the natural domain for joint sensing-communication processing.

Key Takeaway

ISAC waveform design spans OFDM (communication-centric, 5G NR compatible), FMCW (sensing-centric, automotive), and OTFS (joint DD-domain design). The transmit covariance optimisation is a convex SDP. OTFS-ISAC, developed by Yuan/Schober/Caire, is a natural fit because the DD domain provides sparse representations for both communication channels and radar targets, directly connecting to the imaging forward model of this book.