Narrowband Fading: Rayleigh and Ricean

When the Channel Is a Single Complex Number

When the signal bandwidth WW is much smaller than the coherence bandwidth BcB_c (i.e., Wβ‰ͺBcW \ll B_c), all frequency components experience the same fading. The channel reduces to a single complex multiplicative coefficient h(t)=Ξ±(t) ejΟ•(t)h(t) = \alpha(t)\,e^{j\phi(t)}. This is flat fading or narrowband fading. The key question becomes: what is the distribution of the fading envelope r=∣h∣r = |h| and power ∣h∣2|h|^2?

Theorem: Rayleigh Fading Distribution

If the channel consists of a large number of independent scattered paths with no dominant line-of-sight component, then by the Central Limit Theorem the in-phase and quadrature components are i.i.d. Gaussian:

h=X+jY,X,Y∼N(0,Οƒ2)h = X + jY, \quad X, Y \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2)

The envelope r=∣h∣=X2+Y2r = |h| = \sqrt{X^2 + Y^2} follows a Rayleigh distribution:

fr(r)=rΟƒ2exp⁑ ⁣(βˆ’r22Οƒ2),rβ‰₯0f_r(r) = \frac{r}{\sigma^2} \exp\!\left(-\frac{r^2}{2\sigma^2}\right), \quad r \geq 0

The instantaneous power γ=r2=∣h∣2\gamma = r^2 = |h|^2 is exponentially distributed:

fΞ³(Ξ³)=1Ξ³Λ‰exp⁑ ⁣(βˆ’Ξ³Ξ³Λ‰),Ξ³β‰₯0f_\gamma(\gamma) = \frac{1}{\bar{\gamma}} \exp\!\left(-\frac{\gamma}{\bar{\gamma}}\right), \quad \gamma \geq 0

where Ξ³Λ‰=2Οƒ2\bar{\gamma} = 2\sigma^2 is the mean power.

Each scatterer contributes a phasor alejΟ•la_l e^{j\phi_l} with uniformly random phase. Summing many such phasors gives a circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (CLT). The magnitude of a complex Gaussian is Rayleigh, and its squared magnitude is exponential.

,

Definition:

Properties of Rayleigh Fading

For a Rayleigh-distributed envelope rr with parameter Οƒ\sigma:

  • Mean: E[r]=σπ/2β‰ˆ1.253 σE[r] = \sigma\sqrt{\pi/2} \approx 1.253\,\sigma
  • Mean power: Ξ©=E[r2]=2Οƒ2\Omega = E[r^2] = 2\sigma^2
  • Variance: Var(r)=(2βˆ’Ο€/2)Οƒ2\text{Var}(r) = (2 - \pi/2)\sigma^2
  • Median: rmed=Οƒ2ln⁑2β‰ˆ1.177 σr_{\text{med}} = \sigma\sqrt{2\ln 2} \approx 1.177\,\sigma
  • CDF: Fr(r)=1βˆ’eβˆ’r2/(2Οƒ2)F_r(r) = 1 - e^{-r^2/(2\sigma^2)}

The probability of a deep fade below threshold r0r_0:

P(r≀r0)=1βˆ’eβˆ’r02/(2Οƒ2)β‰ˆr022Οƒ2forΒ r0β‰ͺΟƒP(r \leq r_0) = 1 - e^{-r_0^2 / (2\sigma^2)} \approx \frac{r_0^2}{2\sigma^2} \quad \text{for } r_0 \ll \sigma

This means deep fades (below βˆ’20-20 dB relative to mean) occur with probability β‰ˆ1\approx 1%.

Theorem: Ricean Fading Distribution

When a dominant line-of-sight (LOS) component with amplitude AA is present alongside scattered components, the channel is

h=A ejΞΈ0+X+jYh = A\,e^{j\theta_0} + X + jY

where X,Y∼N(0,Οƒ2)X, Y \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2). The envelope r=∣h∣r = |h| follows a Ricean distribution:

fr(r)=rΟƒ2exp⁑ ⁣(βˆ’r2+A22Οƒ2)I0 ⁣(rAΟƒ2),rβ‰₯0f_r(r) = \frac{r}{\sigma^2} \exp\!\left(-\frac{r^2 + A^2}{2\sigma^2}\right) I_0\!\left(\frac{rA}{\sigma^2}\right), \quad r \geq 0

where I0(β‹…)I_0(\cdot) is the modified Bessel function of the first kind, order zero. The Ricean K-factor is

K=A22Οƒ2=LOSΒ powerscatteredΒ powerK = \frac{A^2}{2\sigma^2} = \frac{\text{LOS power}}{\text{scattered power}}

The K-factor measures how dominant the LOS component is. K=0K = 0 (A=0A = 0): pure Rayleigh (no LOS). Kβ†’βˆžK \to \infty: the channel becomes deterministic (AWGN-like). Typical values: K=3K = 3–1010 dB for outdoor LOS, K=0K = 0–66 dB for indoor.

,

Definition:

Nakagami-m Fading

The Nakagami-mm distribution generalises both Rayleigh and approximates Rice:

fr(r)=2mmr2mβˆ’1Ξ“(m) Ωmexp⁑ ⁣(βˆ’mr2Ξ©),rβ‰₯0f_r(r) = \frac{2m^m r^{2m-1}}{\Gamma(m)\,\Omega^m} \exp\!\left(-\frac{m r^2}{\Omega}\right), \quad r \geq 0

where Ξ©=E[r2]\Omega = E[r^2] and mβ‰₯1/2m \geq 1/2 is the fading parameter:

  • m=1m = 1: Rayleigh
  • m=(K+1)2/(2K+1)m = (K+1)^2/(2K+1): approximates Ricean with K-factor KK
  • mβ†’βˆžm \to \infty: no fading (AWGN)

The Nakagami-mm is useful because the power Ξ³=r2\gamma = r^2 follows a Gamma distribution, which has a tractable MGF enabling closed-form BER analysis.

Rayleigh Fading from Random Phasor Sum

Visualise the Central Limit Theorem at work: as the number of multipath components LL increases from 1 to 32, the head-to-tail phasor sum converges to a circularly symmetric complex Gaussian, whose envelope follows the Rayleigh distribution.
Random walk of LL phasors in the complex plane. For large LL, the sum h=βˆ‘alejΟ•lh = \sum a_l e^{j\phi_l} is approximately CN(0,2Οƒ2)\mathcal{CN}(0, 2\sigma^2) by the CLT.

Rayleigh vs Ricean Fading Envelope

Adjust the K-factor to see how the fading envelope distribution transitions from Rayleigh (K=0K = 0) to near-deterministic (Kβ†’βˆžK \to \infty). The left panel shows the PDF; the right panel shows a sample time series.

Parameters
6
1

Example: Outage Due to Rayleigh Fading

A Rayleigh fading channel has mean SNR Ξ³Λ‰=20\bar{\gamma} = 20 dB. The receiver requires Ξ³min⁑=10\gamma_{\min} = 10 dB for acceptable performance.

(a) What is the outage probability?

(b) By how much must Ξ³Λ‰\bar{\gamma} increase to achieve 1% outage?

Common Mistake: Assuming Rayleigh Fading Everywhere

Mistake:

Assuming Rayleigh fading for all wireless channels, including LOS scenarios.

Correction:

Rayleigh fading assumes no dominant LOS component. In LOS environments (open rural, elevated BS, indoor near-LOS), the channel is Ricean with a non-zero K-factor. Using Rayleigh in a Ricean channel overestimates outage and underestimates performance, leading to over-provisioned systems.

Quick Check

What fading distribution does the Ricean distribution reduce to as K→0K \to 0?

Gaussian

Rayleigh

Exponential

Uniform

Why This Matters: From Scalar Fading to MIMO Channels

This chapter models fading as a scalar complex coefficient h(t)h(t) or a tapped-delay line. With multiple antennas at transmitter and receiver, the channel becomes a matrix H(f;t)∈CNrΓ—Nt\mathbf{H}(f; t) \in \mathbb{C}^{N_r \times N_t}, where each entry fades according to the distributions in this chapter (Rayleigh, Ricean, Nakagami). The spatial correlation between entries depends on antenna spacing and the angular spread of multipath. The MIMO book develops the full spatial channel model, capacity analysis, and beamforming techniques that build directly on the scalar fading foundations established here.

Rayleigh Fading

Fading model for NLOS channels with many scatterers. The envelope r∼Rayleigh(Οƒ)r \sim \text{Rayleigh}(\sigma) and the power γ∼Exp(1/Ξ³Λ‰)\gamma \sim \text{Exp}(1/\bar{\gamma}).

Related: Ricean Distribution, Nakagami-m Distribution, Multipath Propagation

Ricean K-Factor

K=A2/(2Οƒ2)K = A^2/(2\sigma^2): ratio of LOS power to scattered power. K=0K = 0 is Rayleigh; Kβ†’βˆžK \to \infty is no fading.

Related: Ricean Fading Distribution, Expecting MIMO Gains in LOS Channels, The NLOS Problem: The Dominant Error Source in Practice

Nakagami-m Distribution

A generalised fading distribution with parameter mm. Includes Rayleigh (m=1m=1) and approximates Ricean fading. The power follows a Gamma distribution.

Related: Rayleigh Distribution, Ricean Distribution, Fading Parameter