Narrowband Fading: Rayleigh and Ricean
When the Channel Is a Single Complex Number
When the signal bandwidth is much smaller than the coherence bandwidth (i.e., ), all frequency components experience the same fading. The channel reduces to a single complex multiplicative coefficient . This is flat fading or narrowband fading. The key question becomes: what is the distribution of the fading envelope and power ?
Theorem: Rayleigh Fading Distribution
If the channel consists of a large number of independent scattered paths with no dominant line-of-sight component, then by the Central Limit Theorem the in-phase and quadrature components are i.i.d. Gaussian:
The envelope follows a Rayleigh distribution:
The instantaneous power is exponentially distributed:
where is the mean power.
Each scatterer contributes a phasor with uniformly random phase. Summing many such phasors gives a circularly symmetric complex Gaussian (CLT). The magnitude of a complex Gaussian is Rayleigh, and its squared magnitude is exponential.
CLT application
Write where and are i.i.d.
, .
For large : , with .
Rayleigh PDF
Using the polar transformation with Jacobian :
.
Integrating over :
.
Definition: Properties of Rayleigh Fading
Properties of Rayleigh Fading
For a Rayleigh-distributed envelope with parameter :
- Mean:
- Mean power:
- Variance:
- Median:
- CDF:
The probability of a deep fade below threshold :
This means deep fades (below dB relative to mean) occur with probability %.
Theorem: Ricean Fading Distribution
When a dominant line-of-sight (LOS) component with amplitude is present alongside scattered components, the channel is
where . The envelope follows a Ricean distribution:
where is the modified Bessel function of the first kind, order zero. The Ricean K-factor is
The K-factor measures how dominant the LOS component is. (): pure Rayleigh (no LOS). : the channel becomes deterministic (AWGN-like). Typical values: β dB for outdoor LOS, β dB for indoor.
Non-central chi distribution
(absorbing the LOS phase into without loss of generality).
where .
The magnitude of a complex Gaussian with non-zero mean follows the Rice distribution, which is the square root of a non-central chi-squared with 2 degrees of freedom and non-centrality parameter .
Definition: Nakagami-m Fading
Nakagami-m Fading
The Nakagami- distribution generalises both Rayleigh and approximates Rice:
where and is the fading parameter:
- : Rayleigh
- : approximates Ricean with K-factor
- : no fading (AWGN)
The Nakagami- is useful because the power follows a Gamma distribution, which has a tractable MGF enabling closed-form BER analysis.
Rayleigh Fading from Random Phasor Sum
Rayleigh vs Ricean Fading Envelope
Adjust the K-factor to see how the fading envelope distribution transitions from Rayleigh () to near-deterministic (). The left panel shows the PDF; the right panel shows a sample time series.
Parameters
Example: Outage Due to Rayleigh Fading
A Rayleigh fading channel has mean SNR dB. The receiver requires dB for acceptable performance.
(a) What is the outage probability?
(b) By how much must increase to achieve 1% outage?
Outage probability
For exponentially distributed power: .
In linear: , .
%.
Required mean SNR for 1% outage
dB.
Need dB for 1% outage β a 10 dB increase over the original 20 dB. This illustrates the severe penalty of Rayleigh fading: reducing outage from 10% to 1% requires 10 dB more power.
Common Mistake: Assuming Rayleigh Fading Everywhere
Mistake:
Assuming Rayleigh fading for all wireless channels, including LOS scenarios.
Correction:
Rayleigh fading assumes no dominant LOS component. In LOS environments (open rural, elevated BS, indoor near-LOS), the channel is Ricean with a non-zero K-factor. Using Rayleigh in a Ricean channel overestimates outage and underestimates performance, leading to over-provisioned systems.
Quick Check
What fading distribution does the Ricean distribution reduce to as ?
Gaussian
Rayleigh
Exponential
Uniform
Correct. When , there is no LOS component (), so and the Rice PDF reduces to the Rayleigh PDF.
Why This Matters: From Scalar Fading to MIMO Channels
This chapter models fading as a scalar complex coefficient or a tapped-delay line. With multiple antennas at transmitter and receiver, the channel becomes a matrix , where each entry fades according to the distributions in this chapter (Rayleigh, Ricean, Nakagami). The spatial correlation between entries depends on antenna spacing and the angular spread of multipath. The MIMO book develops the full spatial channel model, capacity analysis, and beamforming techniques that build directly on the scalar fading foundations established here.
Rayleigh Fading
Fading model for NLOS channels with many scatterers. The envelope and the power .
Related: Ricean Distribution, Nakagami-m Distribution, Multipath Propagation
Ricean K-Factor
: ratio of LOS power to scattered power. is Rayleigh; is no fading.
Related: Ricean Fading Distribution, Expecting MIMO Gains in LOS Channels, The NLOS Problem: The Dominant Error Source in Practice
Nakagami-m Distribution
A generalised fading distribution with parameter . Includes Rayleigh () and approximates Ricean fading. The power follows a Gamma distribution.
Related: Rayleigh Distribution, Ricean Distribution, Fading Parameter