Prerequisites & Notation
Before You Begin
This chapter opens Part III β Space-Time Coding. From this chapter onwards, genuinely denotes the MIMO channel matrix (not the Hadamard matrix of Part I or the parity-check matrix of coding-theoretic chapters). The treatment rests on three pillars built in earlier parts and in Book ITA:
- the MIMO capacity formula of Telatar 1995/1999 (Book ITA Ch. 13.5),
- the Chernoff bound + MGF-of- technique used for PEP in Ch. 2 (CM on AWGN) and Ch. 6 (BICM on fading), now applied to the -dimensional diversity branch structure, and
- the quasi-static (block-fading) channel model β a fading realisation that is random but constant over the entire codeword.
Read Book ITA Ch. 13.5 if the i.i.d. Rayleigh MIMO capacity derivation feels unfamiliar. Read Ch. 5 of this book if the block-fading / Rayleigh-fading terminology is not second nature. The PEP derivation in Β§3 builds on Chs. 2 and 6 β if the Chernoff + MGF template is rusty, a quick pass through Ch. 2 Β§3 is recommended.
- MIMO capacity formula (Review ch13)
Self-check: Can you derive the i.i.d. Rayleigh ergodic MIMO capacity via the SVD of and water-filling over the squared singular values? Can you identify the high- prelog as ?
- Chernoff bound and MGF of a central random variable(Review ch02)
Self-check: Given a sum with i.i.d., can you write down the MGF for and use it to produce a Chernoff bound of the form ?
- Pairwise error probability via the Q-function and MGF method(Review ch02)
Self-check: Can you derive the Q-function PEP on AWGN from the conditional Gaussian noise model, then average over Rayleigh fading to obtain the form at diversity one?
- Rayleigh fading and block-fading channel models(Review ch05)
Self-check: Can you state the quasi-static (block-fading) model for with constant across the block, and contrast it with the fully-ergodic (fast-fading) model?
- Singular value decomposition and eigenvalues of (Review ch01)
Self-check: Given with , can you relate the nonzero eigenvalues to the squared singular values and state when ?
- Ergodic vs. outage capacity on a slowly varying fading channel(Review ch05)
Self-check: Can you explain why, on a block-fading channel whose coherence time exceeds the target codeword length, the meaningful capacity notion is rather than the ergodic average?
Notation for This Chapter
Symbols specific to this chapter's space-time code analysis. MIMO system- level notation ( for the channel matrix, for antenna counts, for the total transmit SNR) is assumed from Book ITA Ch. 13.5 and the global notation table. We adopt the convention that the codeword matrix is (columns are time samples) and NOT , to avoid collision with capacity.
| Symbol | Meaning | Introduced |
|---|---|---|
| Transmitted and (erroneous) decoded space-time codeword matrices, each in | s03 | |
| Codeword-pair error matrix, | s03 | |
| Space-time codeword block length (number of channel uses per codeword) | s03 | |
| Rank of the error matrix: | s03 | |
| The -th nonzero eigenvalue of the PSD matrix , | s03 | |
| Pairwise error probability of decoding when was transmitted | s03 | |
| Diversity order; for a space-time code, | s04 | |
| Coding gain; for a full-rank code, | s05 | |
| Outage probability at target rate , | s02 | |
| -outage capacity: largest such that | s02 | |
| Spectral efficiency (bits/s/Hz) of a space-time code, | s03 | |
| Frobenius norm; | s03 |