Exercises
ex-ch20-01
EasyCompute the quantisation SNR for a 4-bit ADC. What is the effective SNR on a channel with input SNR 20 dB after 4-bit quantisation?
Quantisation SNR = 6.02 b + 1.76 dB.
Combined SNR is the harmonic average of the two SNRs.
Quantisation SNR
dB.
Effective SNR
. dB.
Loss
1 dB loss from 4-bit quantisation at 20 dB input. Acceptable for most communication links.
ex-ch20-02
EasyA 1-bit quantised AWGN channel at SNR (0 dB) has capacity bits. How does this compare to Shannon's bit?
Compute the capacity ratio.
Ratio
1-bit / Shannon = 0.735 / 1 = 73.5%.
Interpretation
At 0 dB, 1-bit ADC recovers 73.5% of Shannon capacity. At very low SNR this ratio approaches (low-SNR asymptote in nats). The 0 dB point is intermediate.
ex-ch20-03
EasySpatial Modulation with antennas and 64-QAM on active antenna. Compute the rate.
.
Compute
bits/ch.use.
ex-ch20-04
EasyGSM with antennas, active, and 16-QAM. Compute the rate.
.
Binomial
; bits.
Modulation
bits.
Total
bits/ch.use.
ex-ch20-05
EasyAn 8-bit ADC has quantisation SNR 49.9 dB. At what input SNR does quantisation start to dominate thermal noise?
Quantisation dominates when .
Boundary
at about 50 dB input SNR.
Interpretation
Below 50 dB, thermal noise dominates and 8-bit ADC is sufficient. Above 50 dB (optical coherent systems!), quantisation matters and higher-resolution ADCs are required.
ex-ch20-06
MediumMassive MIMO channel hardening: for and i.i.d. Rayleigh, compute the coefficient of variation of matched-filter SNR and interpret.
.
Coefficient of variation
.
Interpretation
At , the SNR fluctuation is 12.5% around the mean β roughly 1 dB peak-to-peak. From the user's perspective, the channel is nearly deterministic.
Design implication
BICM design at is essentially AWGN design. The ~1 dB BICM-Shannon gap on flat channels (Ch 5) is nearly the full gap; no additional fading penalty.
ex-ch20-07
MediumFor the GSM rate formula , verify that the optimum shifts toward for small and toward for large .
Larger increases the marginal value of each active antenna.
Derivative
(using Stirling for the binomial term). Setting to zero: , i.e. .
Cases
(BPSK): ; : , very close to ; : .
Summary
Larger constellation β more marginal value per antenna β . At the optimum is near ; at large it saturates near (use all antennas).
ex-ch20-08
MediumA 1-bit quantised MIMO uplink has 128 antennas at the BS. Per- antenna SNR before quantisation is 0 dB. Approximate the aggregate BS capacity using the low-SNR asymptotic result.
Low-SNR 1-bit capacity per antenna: .
Per-antenna capacity
bits/use.
Aggregate with MRC
Actually, the BS combines across antennas BEFORE quantisation consequence matters. Effective combined SNR is ( dB). At 21 dB, the 1-bit effect saturates both dimensions: bits.
Insight
The MASSIVE combining PUSH the effective SNR high enough that 1-bit saturates at its hard upper bound (QPSK-equivalent). Hence 1-bit massive MIMO recovers near-full performance at moderate input SNR β provided joint BS processing is used.
ex-ch20-09
HardProve that the low-SNR 1-bit AWGN capacity loss is bits per nat (or dB of SNR) relative to unquantised Shannon.
Low-SNR Shannon: .
Low-SNR 1-bit: use the Taylor expansion of around .
Shannon low-SNR
(in bits per channel use, nats-based).
Q-function expansion
. So .
Binary entropy expansion
. With : .
Capacity
.
Ratio
as . In dB: dB.
ex-ch20-10
HardAn SM system with uses 16-QAM. The channel is i.i.d. Rayleigh with . Estimate BER at SNR 15 dB, assuming the receiver uses sub-optimal two-stage detection (detect antenna first, then QAM).
Two-stage is ~3 dB worse than ML.
ML at full diversity at 15 dB: BER .
ML BER
At diversity , SNR 15 dB: ML BER for 16-QAM.
Two-stage penalty
3 dB worse effective SNR: 12 dB equivalent. BER at 12 dB, diversity 2: .
Design implication
For SM to approach its theoretical performance, ML detection or high-complexity sphere decoding is required. Two-stage decoding is cheap but costly in BER. This is the "hidden cost" of SM.
ex-ch20-11
HardA hybrid beamforming system has , , and 2-bit phase shifters. Estimate the beamforming gain loss relative to fully digital precoding.
2-bit phase quantisation: 4 phase levels per element.
Quantisation levels
4 phase levels per element (0Β°, 90Β°, 180Β°, 270Β°).
Beamforming gain
Optimal unquantised beamforming aligns phases perfectly. With 2-bit quantisation, worst-case phase error is 45Β°; average error is ~22Β°.
Power loss
Beamforming power gain with phase error is . For 22Β° average error: . Loss: ~0.65 dB β modest for 2-bit phase. 3-bit phase reduces the loss to ~0.2 dB.
ex-ch20-12
HardDerive the channel hardening rate for MRC combining: as , the matched-filter SNR distribution converges to a concentrated spike around times the per-antenna mean.
Use the strong law of large numbers for .
SLLN statement
For i.i.d. with mean 1 and variance 1: almost surely.
CLT correction
.
Effective SNR convergence
as . The SNR distribution concentrates around (per-antenna SNR) times β a deterministic limit.
ex-ch20-13
HardIndustry considering 2-bit ADCs for 28 GHz mmWave 256-antenna BS. Estimate the aggregate uplink capacity at per-antenna SNR 5 dB.
2-bit ADC: dB per real dim.
Per-antenna effective SNR
. dB.
Aggregate MRC SNR
dB.
Capacity
bits/use. This is about 80% of full-resolution ADC capacity (10.5 bits/use). 2-bit ADCs trade ~1 dB for 5-6Γ power savings.
ex-ch20-14
HardIndex modulation extended to subcarriers (OFDM-IM): activate 4 of 16 subcarriers, transmit QPSK on each. Compute the rate and compare with full-OFDM (all 16 subcarriers active).
Index bits from subcarrier selection; modulation bits from QPSK per active subcarrier.
OFDM-IM rate
Index bits: bits. Modulation: bits. Total: 18 bits per OFDM symbol. Per-subcarrier: bits/subcarrier.
Full OFDM comparison
Full 16-subcarrier QPSK: bits per symbol. Per-subcarrier: bits/subcarrier.
Trade-off
OFDM-IM has 44% less rate but activates only 4 subcarriers β a 75% reduction in PAPR (peak-to-average power ratio) and simplified power amplifier operation. Attractive for low-power IoT devices.
ex-ch20-15
ChallengeOpen research: design a coded modulation scheme for a 256-antenna BS with 1-bit ADCs. What are the key design choices? Outline a learned-constellation approach inspired by O'Shea-Hoydis 2017.
1-bit + massive MIMO + autoencoder = open research.
Design choices
(1) Joint BS detection β 1-bit signals must be combined across antennas BEFORE making hard decisions. (2) Transmit constellation matched to the 1-bit output alphabet β QPSK-centric with shaping. (3) LDPC or polar code matched to the joint BS detector output statistics.
Autoencoder approach
(i) Model the full 1-bit MIMO link as a neural network. (ii) Jointly learn Tx constellation + BS combiner + decoder via cross-entropy loss over random channels. (iii) Regularise for robustness via channel distribution randomisation.
Challenges
(a) Training convergence in high-dim latent space. (b) Generalisation across different channel distributions. (c) Complexity of receiver during deployment.
Current state
Early results (Mezghani-Swindlehurst 2019+) show ~5% capacity loss at 20 dB SNR with learned schemes vs analytical optimum. Full-scale deployment unlikely before 2030.