Exercises
ex-ch13-01
EasyConsider a Rayleigh fading channel with and noise power . Compute the ergodic capacity (CSIR only) at dB, dB, and dB. Compare each with the AWGN capacity at the same SNR.
The ergodic capacity is where .
Use the exponential integral: , or evaluate numerically.
Set up the integral
.
Numerical evaluation
- (0 dB): bits, bits. Loss: 25%.
- (10 dB): bits, bits. Loss: 8.7%.
- (20 dB): bits, bits. Loss: 7.4%.
The fading penalty decreases (in relative terms) as SNR increases, but in absolute terms it approaches the constant bits.
ex-ch13-02
EasyShow that for a deterministic channel ( with probability 1), the ergodic capacity formula reduces to the AWGN capacity with received SNR .
If a.s., the expectation over collapses to a single value.
Substitute deterministic $H$
, which is exactly the AWGN capacity with SNR .
ex-ch13-03
EasyFor a quasi-static Rayleigh fading channel, derive the outage probability in closed form and plot it as a function of (in dB) for bit/use.
Express the outage event in terms of and use the CDF of the exponential distribution.
Outage event
Outage occurs when , i.e., where we define .
CDF of exponential
For : , so .
At high SNR: , confirming diversity order 1.
ex-ch13-04
MediumProve that for any fading distribution with , the ergodic capacity satisfies
at high SNR. This bound shows that the capacity loss depends on the geometric mean of , not just the arithmetic mean.
At high SNR, .
Apply Jensen's inequality to if needed, or use the exact high-SNR expansion.
High-SNR expansion
For large : .
Exact bound
More carefully, using for : . Taking expectations: .
Rewriting: .
In natural log form with the stated notation: follows from and the convexity adjustment.
ex-ch13-05
MediumFor a Rician fading channel with Rician factor : , .
(a) Show that .
(b) Argue that as , the ergodic capacity approaches the AWGN capacity, and as , it approaches the Rayleigh ergodic capacity.
Compute by expanding.
For part (b), note that means a.s.
(a) Compute $\mathbb{E}[|H|^2]$
.
Taking expectations: and , so
.
(b) Limiting cases
As : deterministically, so .
As : , which is Rayleigh fading, so . The Rician factor interpolates between the two extremes.
ex-ch13-06
MediumFor the water-filling power allocation over Rayleigh fading states, show that the fraction of time the transmitter is silent is where . Compute this fraction for dB.
The transmitter is silent when .
For each SNR, you need to solve the water-filling equation numerically to find .
Silent fraction formula
The transmitter is silent when , i.e., when . For :
.
Numerical results
Solving the power constraint equation numerically:
- dB: , silent fraction .
- dB: , silent fraction .
- dB: , silent fraction .
At high SNR, the water level is so high that almost all states are active, and water-filling converges to constant power.
ex-ch13-07
MediumConsider a quasi-static fading channel with independent Rayleigh branches combined by MRC. Show that the -outage capacity at high SNR satisfies
Use the high-SNR approximation and invert to find .
Invert the outage expression
At high SNR, where .
Setting : .
Compute outage capacity
, so
.
Notice that each additional diversity branch multiplies the effective SNR by a factor proportional to .
ex-ch13-08
MediumFor a MIMO channel with CSIT, suppose the singular values of are and , with and .
(a) Compute the water-filling power allocation.
(b) Compute the capacity.
(c) Compare with equal power allocation.
Check whether both sub-channels are active by verifying for each .
(a) Water-filling
Sub-channel gains: , . Noise floors: , .
Check if both active: , giving .
Since , both are active: , .
(b) Capacity
bits/use.
(c) Equal power comparison
Equal power: . bits/use.
Water-filling gain: bits. The gain is modest because both sub-channels are reasonably strong. Water-filling provides larger gains when the sub-channels are more disparate.
ex-ch13-09
HardProve that for the ergodic fading channel with CSIR only, the capacity can be written as
is not the cleanest form. Instead, derive the alternative closed-form expression for Rayleigh fading:
where is the exponential integral.
Start with .
Integrate by parts with and .
Integration by parts
Let and . Then and .
The boundary term (both limits vanish). So
.
Substitution
Let , so and :
.
Let : .
ex-ch13-10
HardConsider a MISO channel (2 transmit, 1 receive antenna) with and i.i.d. . The channel model is .
(a) With CSIT, show that beamforming () is optimal and compute the capacity.
(b) Without CSIT, show that is optimal and compute the ergodic capacity.
(c) Compare the two at dB.
For (a), with CSIT the transmitter can align the transmitted signal with the channel direction.
For (b), use the symmetry argument for i.i.d. channels.
(a) CSIT beamforming
With CSIT, the transmitter uses where . The effective channel becomes , an AWGN channel with gain .
The capacity is . Since (chi-squared with 4 DoF), this gives an array gain of 2 compared to SISO.
(b) No CSIT
Without CSIT, by the symmetry argument. The mutual information is
.
The ergodic capacity is .
(c) Comparison at 10 dB
At , numerical computation with :
- CSIT: bits/use.
- No CSIT: bits/use.
The CSIT gain is about 0.69 bits, which is the 3 dB array gain from coherent beamforming ( vs ).
ex-ch13-11
HardDerive the ergodic capacity of a SIMO channel with i.i.d. Rayleigh fading and CSIR (no CSIT). Show that the capacity is where , and evaluate the high-SNR approximation.
For SIMO, the optimal receiver is the matched filter (MRC), which combines the received signals coherently.
At high SNR, use the digamma function to evaluate .
SIMO capacity
With , the channel is where . MRC gives , an effective scalar channel with SNR .
Since has i.i.d. entries, .
High-SNR approximation
At high SNR:
where is the digamma function.
For : , so the array gain over SISO is about 0.61 bits at high SNR.
ex-ch13-12
HardFor the DMT of a i.i.d. Rayleigh MIMO channel, verify the optimal tradeoff curve for at the extreme points , , and .
At : maximum diversity . At : maximum multiplexing .
At : , meaning the Alamouti code achieves diversity 1 with multiplexing gain 1.
Evaluate the DMT curve
for :
- : . Full diversity, fixed rate.
- : . One degree of freedom for rate, one for diversity.
- : . Maximum multiplexing gain, no diversity protection.
Interpretation
At , the rate is fixed (does not grow with SNR) and the error probability decays as . At , the rate grows as but with no diversity gain (error does not decay with SNR). The Zheng-Tse curve shows that every unit of multiplexing gain costs quadratic diversity.
ex-ch13-13
MediumShow that for a SIMO channel with MRC in quasi-static Rayleigh fading, the outage probability at rate is
where .
The combined SNR with MRC is , where .
Gamma CDF
With MRC, the total fading gain is . Outage occurs when :
.
This is the regularized incomplete gamma function. At high SNR, , confirming diversity order .
ex-ch13-14
MediumConsider the MIMO capacity formula .
(a) Show that this can be rewritten as using .
(b) Explain why this identity is useful when .
The Sylvester determinant identity states for , .
(a) Apply the Sylvester identity
Let and . More directly, set (size ):
.
(b) Computational advantage
The left form involves a of an matrix; the right form involves an matrix. When (e.g., massive MIMO with many more receive than transmit antennas), the right form is cheaper to compute: vs .
ex-ch13-15
HardFor a i.i.d. Rayleigh MIMO channel without CSIT, the ergodic capacity with is
Show that this can be expressed in terms of the ordered eigenvalues of the Wishart matrix as
and provide the joint PDF of .
The eigenvalues of where is i.i.d. follow a Wishart distribution.
The joint PDF involves .
Eigenvalue decomposition
, where are the eigenvalues of the central Wishart matrix .
Joint PDF (Wishart)
For with i.i.d. entries, the joint PDF of the ordered eigenvalues is
This follows from the general Wishart eigenvalue distribution. The term is the Vandermonde determinant squared, reflecting the repulsion between eigenvalues.
ex-ch13-16
Challenge(Channel inversion capacity.) For the ergodic fading channel with full CSI, consider the truncated channel inversion policy: the transmitter inverts the channel when (maintaining constant received SNR ) and stays silent otherwise.
(a) Show that the power constraint yields .
(b) Show that the capacity with truncated inversion is , where .
(c) Optimize over numerically for Rayleigh fading at dB and compare with water-filling.
The transmitter uses power when and otherwise.
The average power is .
(a) Power constraint
The power allocation is for and otherwise. The average power is
.
Solving: .
(b) Capacity with truncated inversion
When active (), the received SNR is constant , so the rate is . The transmitter is active a fraction of the time. The effective rate is
.
(c) Numerical optimization
For Rayleigh fading at 10 dB, numerically optimizing over gives bits/use, compared to the water-filling capacity of bits/use and the CSIR-only capacity of bits/use.
Truncated inversion is suboptimal but simpler to implement than water-filling, and it outperforms CSIR-only at this SNR.
ex-ch13-17
Challenge(MIMO ergodic capacity scaling.) For an i.i.d. Rayleigh MIMO channel with , use random matrix theory to show that as with fixed, the normalized ergodic capacity
where is the Marchenko-Pastur distribution with ratio 1. Evaluate this integral at dB.
The eigenvalues of converge to the Marchenko-Pastur law as .
For square matrices (ratio ), the Marchenko-Pastur density is for .
Apply the Marchenko-Pastur law
The empirical eigenvalue distribution of converges to the Marchenko-Pastur distribution with parameter . The support is and the density is
for .
The per-antenna capacity converges to
.
Numerical evaluation at 10 dB
At , numerical integration gives
bits per antenna per channel use.
This means a system achieves about bits/use. Foschini's original 1996 simulation for a system at dB gave about 40 bits/s/Hz, consistent with this analysis.
ex-ch13-18
EasyShow that the MIMO capacity formula reduces to the scalar AWGN capacity when .
With , is a scalar, , and of a matrix is the scalar itself.
Substitute scalar quantities
With : , , and
.
For (AWGN), this is , which is the complex AWGN capacity.
ex-ch13-19
MediumFor the ergodic fading channel with CSIR and CSIT, show that the capacity with water-filling can be written as
For states with , substitute into .
Substitute water-filling solution
For active states ():
.
For silent states (), the rate is 0. Therefore
.
ex-ch13-20
Challenge(MIMO outage probability.) For a i.i.d. Rayleigh MIMO channel without CSIT (), the outage probability at multiplexing gain (rate ) is
(a) Show that at high SNR, the outage event is dominated by the event .
(b) Using the fact that for small in the Wishart case, verify that the diversity order is for .
At high SNR, the outage is dominated by the weakest eigenvalue.
For the case, .
(a) Dominant outage event
At high SNR, .
The outage event is dominated by the event where the minimum eigenvalue is small. Specifically, the typical behavior of is , so . The outage then requires , i.e., .
(b) Diversity order
For the Wishart, for small . So
.
Wait β more carefully, the CDF of for Wishart satisfies for small (since here). So
, giving diversity order . But the DMT is , which requires the more refined analysis accounting for the joint behavior of both eigenvalues. The full proof uses the Laplace method on the Wishart joint eigenvalue distribution and yields .