Part 5: Modern Extensions

Chapter 19: Probabilistic Shaping and Geometric Shaping

Advanced~220 min

Learning Objectives

  • State the Maxwell-Boltzmann optimality theorem: on a finite constellation X\mathcal{X} subject to an average-power constraint, the capacity-achieving input distribution is pΞ»(x)∝exp⁑(βˆ’Ξ»βˆ£x∣2)p_\lambda(x) \propto \exp(-\lambda |x|^2), and derive Ξ»(E)\lambda(E) from the KKT conditions for the max-entropy-at-fixed-second-moment problem
  • Derive the Bocherer-Steiner-Schulte (2015) Probabilistic Amplitude Shaping (PAS) rate R=Rclog⁑2M+(Rcβˆ’1)R = R_c \log_2 M + (R_c - 1) bits/symbol and explain why the systematic-LDPC sign/parity decomposition preserves the MB distribution on the amplitude bits
  • Construct a constant-composition distribution matcher (CCDM) via arithmetic coding, state its O(log⁑n/n)O(\log n / n) rate-loss bound, and quantify the short-block penalty that motivates hierarchical and product distribution matchers
  • Design a geometrically shaped non-uniform constellation for a target SNR by solving max⁑XI(X;Y)\max_{\mathcal{X}} I(X;Y) over point locations, and prove that at high SNR geometric and probabilistic shaping achieve the same asymptotic gap to capacity (Ο€e/6β‰ˆ1.53\pi e / 6 \approx 1.53 dB)
  • Operate a rate-adaptive PAS transceiver that varies the information rate continuously over R∈[0,log⁑2M]R \in [0, \log_2 M] by tuning Ξ»\lambda and the LDPC rate RcR_c, without changing the modulation format, and compare it to the discrete MCS-staircase approach
  • Identify the three deployment domains where probabilistic shaping is mandatory or proposed β€” OIF 400ZR coherent optical (mandatory), DVB-S2X (optional), ATSC 3.0 (geometric), 6G eMBB (proposed) β€” and argue from system constraints why each standard picked the shaping variant it did

Sections

Prerequisites

πŸ’¬ Discussion

Loading discussions...