Exercises
ex-ch24-01
EasyAn LTE cell operates with 5 MHz bandwidth.
(a) How many resource blocks are available? (b) How many subcarriers (excluding DC)? (c) With normal CP, how many resource elements per subframe?
5 MHz bandwidth corresponds to 25 RBs in LTE.
Resource blocks
(a) From the LTE bandwidth-to-RB mapping table: 5 MHz 25 RBs.
Subcarriers
(b) subcarriers (plus DC subcarrier, not used). FFT size: 512.
Resource elements
(c) Per subframe (1 ms = 14 symbols with normal CP): REs.
ex-ch24-02
MediumCompare the PAPR characteristics of OFDMA and SC-FDMA for a 16-QAM signal with 12 subcarriers (1 RB).
(a) What is the theoretical maximum PAPR of the OFDMA signal (12 subcarriers, all same constellation point)? (b) What is the PAPR of the SC-FDMA signal for the same allocation? (c) If the PA has at 23 dBm, what average transmit power can each scheme use while maintaining linearity?
OFDMA PAPR for subcarriers.
OFDMA PAPR
(a) Worst-case PAPR for 12 subcarriers: dB. Typical (99.9th percentile) for 16-QAM: 7--8 dB.
SC-FDMA PAPR
(b) SC-FDMA with DFT precoding: the signal envelope is single-carrier-like. For 16-QAM: -- dB (similar to single-carrier 16-QAM). Gain: 3--4 dB.
Average power comparison
(c) With dBm and 2 dB margin: OFDMA: dBm. SC-FDMA: dBm.
SC-FDMA achieves 3.5 dB higher average power, directly improving uplink coverage and cell-edge performance.
ex-ch24-03
EasyIdentify the LTE physical channel responsible for each function:
(a) Carrying user data on the downlink. (b) Transmitting scheduling grants to UEs. (c) Broadcasting the Master Information Block. (d) Carrying HARQ ACK/NACK from UE to eNB. (e) Providing uplink channel sounding.
LTE has PDSCH, PDCCH, PBCH, PUSCH, PUCCH, SRS.
Channel mapping
(a) PDSCH β Physical Downlink Shared Channel. (b) PDCCH β Physical Downlink Control Channel. (c) PBCH β Physical Broadcast Channel. (d) PUCCH β Physical Uplink Control Channel. (e) SRS β Sounding Reference Signal (not a channel per se, but a reference signal on the uplink).
ex-ch24-04
HardThe LTE CRS pattern uses every 6th subcarrier on specific OFDM symbols for a 2-port configuration.
(a) Compute the CRS overhead as a fraction of total REs per RB for 1, 2, and 4 antenna ports. (b) Explain why this "always-on" CRS becomes inefficient as the number of antenna ports grows. (c) How does NR address this limitation with DM-RS and CSI-RS?
CRS: 4 REs per port per RB per slot for ports 0-1, additional 4 for ports 2-3.
CRS overhead
(a) Per RB per slot (84 REs): 1 port: 4 REs %. 2 ports: 8 REs %. 4 ports: 16 REs (including port 2/3 positions) %.
Scalability problem
(b) With massive MIMO (e.g., 32 ports), always-on CRS would require 32 orthogonal pilot patterns enormous overhead (%). The CRS design fundamentally does not scale beyond 4 ports.
NR solution
(c) NR uses configurable DM-RS (only when data is transmitted, only on allocated RBs) and configurable CSI-RS (only when CSI measurement is needed). This decouples overhead from antenna count: 32-port CSI-RS is configured infrequently (e.g., every 5 ms), while DM-RS uses only 1--2 ports for demodulation. Total overhead: 10--15% regardless of antenna count.
ex-ch24-05
EasyFor each NR numerology , compute:
(a) The OFDM symbol duration (useful part only). (b) The slot duration. (c) The number of slots per 10 ms frame.
seconds.
Computation table
| (s) | (ms) | Slots/frame | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 66.67 | 1.0 | 10 |
| 1 | 33.33 | 0.5 | 20 |
| 2 | 16.67 | 0.25 | 40 |
| 3 | 8.33 | 0.125 | 80 |
Each step doubles the SCS, halves the symbol duration, halves the slot duration, and doubles the slots per frame.
ex-ch24-06
MediumA 5G NR cell operates at 3.5 GHz with 100 MHz bandwidth and (30 kHz SCS).
(a) Compute the maximum number of RBs. (b) With 4-layer MU-MIMO, 64-QAM, code rate 0.65, and 18% overhead, estimate the cell average throughput. (c) Compare to a 20 MHz LTE cell with 22 MIMO and the same code rate.
Usable bandwidth after guard: approximately 98 MHz for 100 MHz NR.
NR RBs
(a) Usable BW: 98 MHz. Subcarriers: . RBs: (3GPP specifies 273).
NR throughput
(b) REs per slot: . Data REs: . Bits per RE: bits. Per slot: bits. Per second: Gbps.
LTE comparison
(c) LTE 20 MHz, 2x2: 100 RBs, 2 layers, same MCS. Data REs per subframe: . Bits: . Throughput: Mbps.
NR/LTE ratio: .
ex-ch24-07
MediumA UE is configured with two BWPs:
- BWP 1: 24 RBs, (30 kHz SCS) β for monitoring/low activity.
- BWP 2: 273 RBs, (30 kHz SCS) β for data transfer.
(a) What is the bandwidth of each BWP? (b) Estimate the power saving factor when operating on BWP 1 vs. BWP 2, assuming RF power scales with bandwidth. (c) If the UE spends 80% of time on BWP 1, what is the overall power reduction compared to always using BWP 2?
BW = .
BWP bandwidths
(a) BWP 1: MHz MHz. BWP 2: MHz MHz.
Power saving
(b) RF power (ADC, LNA bandwidth) scales roughly linearly: (% reduction on BWP 1).
Overall reduction
(c) Average power: .
Overall reduction: %. BWP switching is a major UE power saving mechanism in NR.
ex-ch24-08
MediumA 5G NR gNB in FR2 uses 8 SSB beams with 20 ms periodicity.
(a) What is the angular coverage per beam for a sector? (b) What is the worst-case initial access latency? (c) If the UE moves at 30 km/h, how far does it travel during one SSB period?
Angular coverage = sector width / number of beams.
Angular coverage
(a) per beam.
Access latency
(b) Worst case: UE arrives just after SSB burst. Wait up to 20 ms (SSB periodicity) + RACH 5 ms. Total: 25 ms.
UE displacement
(c) m/s. In 20 ms: m. Negligible β the beam does not need to be updated every SSB period at walking/driving speeds.
ex-ch24-09
HardCompare Type I and Type II CSI feedback for a gNB with 32 antenna ports serving 4 MU-MIMO users.
(a) For Type I (single-beam, rank-1 per user): estimate the feedback overhead per user per reporting instance. (b) For Type II ( beams, rank-1 per user): estimate the feedback overhead. (c) Using simulation results from the literature, estimate the MU-MIMO sum spectral efficiency with each type at 10 dB SNR. (d) Compute the feedback efficiency (bits of throughput per bit of feedback overhead) for each type.
Type I: PMI bits wideband
- 2--4 bits per subband.
Type I overhead
(a) Wideband PMI (): 4 bits (beam group from oversampled DFT). Subband PMI (): 2 bits 13 subbands bits. RI: 2 bits. CQI: 4 bits (WB) + bits (SB). Total: 62 bits.
Type II overhead
(b) beam indices: bits. Wideband amplitudes: bits. Subband coefficients: bits (phase beams subbands). Total: 246 bits.
Spectral efficiency comparison
(c) At 10 dB SNR, 32 ports, 4 users (from literature): Type I: 18 bps/Hz (MU-MIMO). Type II (): 28 bps/Hz. Ideal CSI: 32 bps/Hz.
Feedback efficiency
(d) Type I: throughput bits per feedback bit (100 Hz report rate, 4 users). Type II: .
Type I has better feedback efficiency, but Type II delivers 55% higher absolute throughput.
ex-ch24-10
MediumDesign a URLLC transmission for 32-byte payload, BLER, 1 ms latency at (30 kHz SCS).
(a) How many OFDM symbols fit in 1 ms? (b) Allocate resources for a 2-symbol mini-slot with QPSK rate 1/5 and compute the required RBs. (c) How many HARQ retransmissions fit within 1 ms? (d) If each transmission has BLER , what is the effective BLER after 2 transmissions (chase combining)?
With chase combining, BLER after 2 transmissions BLER (optimistic approximation).
Symbols in 1 ms
(a) Slot = 0.5 ms = 14 symbols. In 1 ms: 28 symbols.
Resource allocation
(b) 256 data bits at rate 1/5: 1280 coded bits. QPSK: 2 bits/RE. REs needed: 640. Per 2-symbol mini-slot: 12 data REs per RB (2 symbols 12 subcarriers, minus DM-RS). RBs: RBs.
HARQ feasibility
(c) Mini-slot: s. Processing (N2): 10 symbols s. One round trip: s. Only 1 retransmission fits within 1 ms.
Effective BLER
(d) With chase combining and BLER = per transmission: After 2 transmissions: BLER (accounting for combining gain reducing the second BLER).
Not sufficient for . Need BLER per transmission (lower MCS) or more repetitions.
ex-ch24-11
EasyMatch each 5G use case to its primary KPI:
(a) eMBB: peak data rate, spectral efficiency, or connection density? (b) URLLC: peak data rate, user-plane latency, or battery life? (c) mMTC: spectral efficiency, latency, or connection density?
Each use case has one primary metric that drives its design.
KPI matching
(a) eMBB: Peak data rate (20 Gbps DL) and spectral efficiency (30 bps/Hz) are the primary KPIs.
(b) URLLC: User-plane latency (1 ms) and reliability ( BLER) are the primary KPIs.
(c) mMTC: Connection density ( devices/km) and battery life (10 years) are the primary KPIs.
ex-ch24-12
HardAnalyse the finite-blocklength penalty for URLLC.
(a) For an AWGN channel at SNR = 5 dB, compute the Shannon capacity . (b) Using the normal approximation, compute the maximum achievable rate at block length and BLER . (c) Repeat for BLER and compute the rate loss from the tighter reliability requirement. (d) Express the rate loss as an equivalent SNR penalty.
. For AWGN: (in nats).
Shannon capacity
(a) bits/c.u.
Finite blocklength rate at $10^{-5}$
(b) . . In bits: . .
bits/c.u.
Rate at BLER $10^{-1}$
(c) . bits/c.u.
Rate loss from reliability: bits/c.u.
Equivalent SNR penalty
(d) To achieve 1.64 bits/c.u. with : . dB. Shannon needs dB for 2.06 bits.
SNR penalty dB... more precisely: to achieve 1.93 bits Shannon needs dB. So from to , we lose 0.29 bits, equivalent to dB SNR penalty at this operating point.
ex-ch24-13
EasyFill in the comparison table for LTE vs NR:
(a) Maximum channel bandwidth per CC. (b) Maximum number of MIMO layers (DL). (c) Channel coding for data channels. (d) Minimum scheduling granularity (in OFDM symbols).
NR Rel-15/16 parameters.
Comparison
| Feature | LTE | NR |
|---|---|---|
| (a) Max BW/CC | 20 MHz | 400 MHz (FR2) |
| (b) Max layers | 8 (Rel-10) | 8 (Rel-15) |
| (c) Data coding | Turbo codes | LDPC codes |
| (d) Min sched. | 14 symbols | 2 symbols |
NR's bandwidth advantage and finer scheduling granularity are the most impactful changes.
ex-ch24-14
MediumAn operator has 100 MHz of spectrum at 3.5 GHz and considers three deployment options:
- Option A: 5 LTE carriers 20 MHz with CA.
- Option B: 1 NR carrier 100 MHz.
- Option C: 2 NR carriers 50 MHz with CA.
(a) Compare the control channel overhead for each option. (b) Which option has the best spectral efficiency? Why? (c) Which option provides the best URLLC latency?
Each LTE carrier requires its own PDCCH, CRS, PSS/SSS.
Control overhead
(a) Option A: 5 separate PDCCH regions, 5 sets of CRS. Overhead: 20--25% per carrier 5. Option B: 1 CORESET, shared DM-RS. Overhead: 14%. Option C: 2 CORESETs, but NR CA is more efficient than LTE CA. Overhead: 15%.
Spectral efficiency
(b) Option B has the best spectral efficiency:
- Fewest guard bands (single carrier).
- Lowest control overhead.
- Widest scheduling bandwidth (better frequency diversity and more flexible scheduling).
URLLC latency
(c) Options B and C (NR) support mini-slot scheduling (71 s at ). Option A (LTE) has minimum TTI of 1 ms. NR is 14 faster.
ex-ch24-15
HardAnalyse the peak rate evolution from LTE to NR to 5G-Advanced:
(a) LTE Rel-8: 20 MHz, 22, 64-QAM, R=0.93. (b) LTE-A Rel-10: MHz CA, 44, 64-QAM, R=0.93. (c) NR Rel-15: 400 MHz (FR2), 88, 256-QAM, R=0.93. (d) NR Rel-17: MHz CA (FR2), 88, 256-QAM. (e) Plot the peak rate evolution and identify the dominant technology driver at each step.
Peak rate .
LTE Rel-8
(a) Mbps.
LTE-A Rel-10
(b) Gbps. Driver: CA ( BW) + 44 MIMO ( layers).
NR Rel-15
(c) Gbps. Driver: mmWave BW ( MHz) + 256-QAM + 8 layers.
NR Rel-17
(d) Gbps. Driver: FR2 carrier aggregation.
Evolution summary
(e)
| Release | Peak rate | Dominant driver |
|---|---|---|
| LTE R8 | 150 Mbps | OFDM+MIMO baseline |
| LTE-A R10 | 1.1 Gbps | CA + 4x4 MIMO |
| NR R15 | 12.9 Gbps | mmWave BW + 8-layer |
| NR R17 | 51.6 Gbps | FR2 CA (4 CC) |
Each generation delivers 5--10 through bandwidth and spatial multiplexing scaling.
ex-ch24-16
MediumDiscuss the key 5G-Advanced (Rel-18/19) and 6G technology directions:
(a) AI/ML for PHY: How could a neural network replace the CQI reporting and MCS selection pipeline? (b) Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RIS): What problem does RIS solve that cannot be addressed by adding more antennas? (c) Joint Communication and Sensing (JCAS): How can the NR waveform be reused for radar-like sensing? (d) Sub-THz (100--300 GHz): What are the two main challenges compared to FR2 mmWave?
Think about coverage gaps, spectrum reuse, and atmospheric absorption.
AI/ML for PHY
(a) A neural network can directly map received pilots to optimal MCS, bypassing the CQI SINR BLER MCS chain. Benefits: adapts to non-standard channels (hardware impairments, interference patterns) that the SINR-based model misses. Challenge: training data distribution shift across deployments.
RIS
(b) RIS creates controllable reflections to reach NLoS locations without deploying new active base stations. Unlike adding antennas, RIS is passive (no power amplifier, no backhaul), enabling deployment on building facades at low cost. Key use: coverage extension in mmWave NLoS.
JCAS
(c) The OFDM waveform is already similar to a stepped-frequency radar. By processing the reflected signal from transmitted OFDM symbols, the gNB can estimate range () and velocity (). NR's wide bandwidth at mmWave gives cm-level range resolution.
Sub-THz challenges
(d) Two main challenges:
- Atmospheric absorption: peaks at 183 GHz (water vapor) and 325 GHz (water vapor) create 100 dB/km attenuation windows, limiting range to 10--50 m outdoor.
- Device technology: PA output power at 300 GHz is limited to 0--5 dBm with current III-V semiconductors, requiring very large arrays ( elements) for useful link budgets.
ex-ch24-17
HardA 5G NR cell in FR2 (28 GHz) uses 64 SSB beams to cover a sector with periodicity 20 ms.
(a) How many SSB blocks fit within a single SSB burst set (half-frame = 5 ms) at (120 kHz SCS)? (b) Each SSB occupies 4 OFDM symbols and 240 subcarriers (20 RBs). Compute the time-frequency resources consumed by one SSB burst set. (c) What fraction of the total cell resources is consumed by SSB if the cell has 264 RBs?
3GPP allows up to 64 SSB beams in FR2 within the 5 ms window.
SSB blocks per burst
(a) At : slot = 0.125 ms, 14 symbols/slot. In 5 ms: slots symbols. Each SSB: 4 symbols. Up to 64 SSBs fit (64 4 = 256 symbols, well within 560).
Resources per burst set
(b) Per SSB: REs. Per burst set: REs.
Overhead fraction
(c) Total REs in 5 ms: REs. SSB overhead: %.
With 20 ms periodicity, the overhead per frame is %. SSB overhead is modest even with 64 beams.
ex-ch24-18
HardA network operator deploys a 5G NR network slice for V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) communication requiring:
- End-to-end latency ms
- Reliability %
- Payload: 300 bytes every 10 ms per vehicle
- 50 vehicles per cell
(a) Design the radio interface: choose , mini-slot length, and MCS to meet the latency and reliability targets. (b) Compute the total uplink resource consumption (RBs per slot) for 50 vehicles. (c) If the cell has 100 MHz bandwidth (), what fraction of uplink resources does V2X consume? (d) Can the remaining resources support eMBB traffic? Estimate the achievable eMBB throughput.
V2X uses Mode 2 (UE-autonomous resource selection) or Mode 1 (gNB-scheduled).
Budget latency: 1 ms air interface + 1 ms processing + 3 ms core network.
Radio interface design
(a) (30 kHz SCS): slot = 0.5 ms. Mini-slot: 4 symbols s. Air interface budget: 1 ms 2 mini-slot transmissions (1 initial + 1 retransmission for reliability). MCS: QPSK R = 1/3 for BLER per transmission. After 2 transmissions: BLER (with HARQ combining gain).
Resource consumption
(b) 2400 data bits per vehicle at R = 1/3: 7200 coded bits. QPSK: 3600 REs. Per 4-symbol mini-slot: 36 data REs/RB. RBs per vehicle: RBs per transmission. With 10 ms period and 0.5 ms slots: each vehicle needs 100 RBs in 1 of every 20 slots. Per slot (average): RBs.
Resource fraction
(c) Total UL RBs at , 100 MHz: 273 per slot. V2X: 250/273 %.
This is too high. Solutions: (i) Use 16-QAM R = 1/2 reducing RBs by to 83 RBs/slot (%); (ii) Use configured grants to reduce PDCCH overhead; (iii) Allocate a dedicated BWP for V2X.
Remaining eMBB capacity
(d) With 16-QAM R=1/2 V2X: 83 RBs consumed, 190 RBs remain. eMBB with 64-QAM R = 0.65, 4-layer MIMO: Mbps.
The network slice can support both V2X and 700 Mbps eMBB on shared 100 MHz spectrum.